TSX open
Loading markets…

Advertisement

Investing

EMA vs CPX: which stock is the better value?

By Wealth Awesome -
Stocks & ETFs:EMA.TOCPX.TO

Follow EMA

Photos provided by Pexels

In the utilities sector, Emera Inc. and Capital Power Corporation offer interesting investment options, but how do they stack up against each other on key financial metrics?

Emera Inc. (EMA.TO) and Capital Power Corporation (CPX.TO) are both major players in the utilities sector, yet they have different financial profiles. For investors looking for value, it’s important to understand how these companies compare. In this comparison, we’ll look at their price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-earnings growth (PEG), and price-to-book (P/B) ratios, along with other key metrics.

Investor takeaway: Emera Inc. appears cheaper on several valuation multiples compared to Capital Power Corporation, but this doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the better investment.

Advertisement

Stocks in this list

Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.

Advertisement

Valuation Metrics Comparison

Emera Inc. is cheaper on most P/E, PEG, and P/B ratios, which suggests potential value, but this doesn’t guarantee better performance or lower risk.

Advertisement

Bull case

Emera Inc. offers a more attractive valuation with lower P/E and P/B ratios, indicating it might provide better value for investors. Plus, its dividend yield of 4.28% is appealing for those focused on income.

Bear case

Even though Emera Inc. has lower valuation metrics, it has a relatively low return on equity (ROE) of 7.6%, while Capital Power’s ROE is only 2.4%. This raises concerns about how effectively Emera is generating profits from its shareholder equity.

Dividend Yield and Return on Equity

Both companies have similar dividend yields, with Emera at 4.28% and Capital Power slightly higher at 4.29%. However, the return on equity (ROE) tells a different story, with Emera achieving a ROE of 7.6%, significantly outperforming Capital Power's 2.4%. This difference suggests that while Emera may be cheaper, it also shows a stronger ability to generate profits from its equity base.

Advertisement

Wealth Awesome
Written by

Wealth Awesome

Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.

View Full Profile →

✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals

This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.

Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.

📊 Data AccuracyVerified sources
🇨🇦 Canadian FocusLocal expertise
🔍 Fact-CheckedEditorial review

⚠️ Professional Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.

Published: October 8, 2026
Last Updated: October 8, 2026

Core portfolio

Awesome Portfolio™

14.8% a year since 2017, against 9.7% for the S&P/TSX Composite. Ten stocks, easy to manage. We update it once a month.

Annualized

+14.8%

Awesome Portfolio™

+9.7%

S&P/TSX

+5.0 pp better a year

Total return

+254%

Awesome Portfolio™

+134%

S&P/TSX

+119 pp better than the TSX

2017-07-31 to 2026-09-29, dividends reinvested, before fees and tax.

Awesome Portfolio™S&P/TSX CompositeCumulative return · 2017-07-31–2026-09-29
-11.7%42.5%96.7%150.9%205.1%259.3%Jul 17Oct 19Feb 22Jun 24Sep 26

Sponsored links

Advertisement