TSX open
Loading markets…

Advertisement

Investing

AMD vs KLAC: which stock is the better value?

By Wealth Awesome -
Stocks & ETFs:AMD.USKLAC.US

Follow AMD

Photos provided by Pexels

In the competitive semiconductor industry, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and KLA Corporation present intriguing investment opportunities.

When comparing Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) and KLA Corporation (KLAC), investors often look at valuation metrics to determine which stock might be a better value. Both companies operate in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry, but they have different financial characteristics that could influence investment decisions. This analysis will explore their price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-earnings growth (PEG), and price-to-book (P/B) ratios to assess their relative valuations.

Investor takeaway: AMD appears cheaper on most P/E, PEG, and P/B metrics compared to KLAC, but this doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the better investment choice.

Advertisement

Stocks in this list

Live snapshots — open any name for the full quote and Wealth Awesome price forecast.

Advertisement

Valuation Metrics Comparison

AMD shows a P/E of 155.1, PEG of 0.63, and P/B of 14.76, while KLAC has a P/E of 53.4, PEG of 1.80, and P/B of 40.26.

Bull case

AMD's lower P/E of 155.1 compared to KLAC's 53.4 and a PEG of 0.63 suggests it has growth potential relative to its price. This could attract investors looking for growth opportunities in a rapidly changing technology landscape.

Bear case

On the other hand, KLAC's higher return on equity (ROE) of 87.5% and lower P/E may indicate it’s a more established company with strong profitability. The higher P/B ratio of 40.26 suggests that investors are willing to pay a premium for KLAC's perceived quality and stability.

Valuation Overview

Advertisement

When evaluating AMD and KLAC, the P/E ratio is a key indicator of how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings. AMD's P/E of 155.1 shows that investors are optimistic about its future growth potential, while KLAC's P/E of 53.4 reflects more moderate expectations. The PEG ratio emphasizes AMD's growth potential at 0.63, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 1.80, suggesting AMD may be undervalued relative to its growth prospects.

Profitability and Returns

Profitability metrics tell a different story. KLAC has an impressive ROE of 87.5%, showing strong efficiency in generating profits from shareholders' equity. In contrast, AMD's ROE is 10.2%, which, while respectable, indicates that KLAC is currently more effective at leveraging its equity for profit generation. Additionally, KLAC's dividend yield of 0.41% may attract income-focused investors, while AMD does not offer a dividend.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while AMD seems cheaper based on most P/E, PEG, and P/B metrics, investors should consider the broader context of each company's financial health and growth prospects. KLAC's higher ROE and established market position provide a strong counterpoint to AMD's growth potential. Ultimately, the choice between these two stocks may depend on individual investment strategies and risk tolerance.

Advertisement

Wealth Awesome
Written by

Wealth Awesome

Timely coverage of Canadian stocks, earnings, dividends, and market movers for DIY investors. Stories are checked against exchange data and public filings.

View Full Profile →

✅ Reviewed by Certified Financial Professionals

This content has been reviewed by CFA® charterholders and Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) with over a decade of experience in Canadian financial markets. All information is fact-checked against official Canadian sources and regulations.

Why these credentials matter: CFA® charterholders complete 900+ hours of rigorous study in investment analysis and ethics. CFP® professionals are held to the highest standards of financial planning competency and fiduciary duty in Canada.

📊 Data AccuracyVerified sources
🇨🇦 Canadian FocusLocal expertise
🔍 Fact-CheckedEditorial review

⚠️ Professional Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered personalized financial advice. While our team brings professional expertise, individual circumstances vary. For personalized guidance, consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or mortgage specialist.

Published: October 12, 2026
Last Updated: October 12, 2026

Core portfolio

Awesome Portfolio™

14.8% a year since 2017, against 9.7% for the S&P/TSX Composite. Ten stocks, easy to manage. We update it once a month.

Annualized

+14.8%

Awesome Portfolio™

+9.7%

S&P/TSX

+5.0 pp better a year

Total return

+254%

Awesome Portfolio™

+134%

S&P/TSX

+119 pp better than the TSX

2017-07-31 to 2026-09-29, dividends reinvested, before fees and tax.

Awesome Portfolio™S&P/TSX CompositeCumulative return · 2017-07-31–2026-09-29
-11.7%42.5%96.7%150.9%205.1%259.3%Jul 17Oct 19Feb 22Jun 24Sep 26

Sponsored links

Advertisement